Public beta / Quality ledger

Quality is part of the data.

Reported values, calculated fields, documented gaps and known limitations remain visible instead of being reduced to a single confidence score. Field-level provenance currently covers selected accounting fields and source-backed annual-report data, not every market-data field.

11 companies 105 FY periods with flags 15 periods with warnings/review 125 detailed findings
01

Current public quality view

Quality snapshot by company

Choose a company to see its latest published quality status, flags and findings, drawn from 122 annual quality summaries and 125 detailed findings.

Latest FY status across 11 companies: 5 High confidence3 Verified3 Available with notes

Bachem Holding AG BANB.SW

Quality section on the company page
Latest FY
FY2025
Quality status
High confidence
Flags, latest FY
0
FY periods with flags
6
Detailed findings
0

No issues detected.

Latest FY context: official company source annual report PDF; reported free cash flow missing for all years; reported capex missing where not reported; FY2025 reported capex preserved if present; reported and calculated FCF kept separate; reported and calculated capex kept separate; Bachem 1:5 share split between FY2021 and FY2022; no manual split adjustment; no yfinance or external market/FX data used

Annual quality by fiscal year

  1. FY2025 High confidence Info 0 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 No issues detected.
  2. FY2024 High confidence Info 0 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 No issues detected.
  3. FY2023 High confidence Info 0 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 No issues detected.
  4. FY2022 High confidence Info 0 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 No issues detected.
  5. FY2021 High confidence Info 0 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 No issues detected.
  6. FY2020 Available with notes Info 1 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 Documented source caveat; no data quality error.
  7. FY2019 Available with notes Info 1 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 Documented source caveat; no data quality error.
  8. FY2018 Available with notes Info 1 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 Documented source caveat; no data quality error.
  9. FY2017 Available with notes Info 1 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 Documented source caveat; no data quality error.
  10. FY2016 Available with notes Info 1 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 Documented source caveat; no data quality error.
  11. FY2015 Available with notes Info 1 · Warnings 0 · Review 0 · Critical 0 Documented source caveat; no data quality error.

Detailed findings (0)

No separate detailed findings are published; the annual quality summaries above remain the quality record.

Compare all 11 companies at a glance
Ticker Company Latest FY Status Flags FY periods with flags Detailed findings
BANB.SW Bachem Holding AG 2025 High confidence 0 6 0
BARN.SW Barry Callebaut AG 2025 Verified 0 9 1
DKSH.SW DKSH Holding AG 2025 High confidence 3 11 31
GEBN.SW Geberit AG 2025 High confidence 2 11 31
KLIN.SW Klingelnberg AG 2026 Available with notes 2 12 0
LONN.SW Lonza Group Ltd 2025 Available with notes 1 11 0
MIKN.SW Mikron Holding AG 2025 Verified 0 9 0
PPGN.SW PolyPeptide Group AG 2025 Available with notes 1 11 0
SCMN.SW Swisscom AG 2025 High confidence 3 11 29
SFZN.SW Siegfried Holding AG 2025 Verified 0 3 0
SIKA.SW Sika AG 2025 High confidence 2 11 33

Verified means the annual row passed the documented row-level product workflow: all fields required by that row's quality controls were validated, with no missing, review, warning or critical item recorded. It does not mean every product field is in scope or that every displayed value has field-level Evidence.

High confidence means the current quality rules found no review or critical flag. It is a confidence classification, not proof of documented row validation or field-level Evidence.

Available means the row is published. Available with notes and Documented missing keep limitations and unavailable values explicit.

Quality status describes dataset completeness and traceability, not the quality or attractiveness of the underlying company. Detailed findings count rows in the public quality report; the summary can still document reporting-basis context when that count is zero.

02

Annotated examples

How limitations appear in practice

Real examples from the public preview show how usable values, calculations and gaps are documented.

U

Reported / usable with note

Negative cash values

Some companies report negative cash due to overdraft netting or cash pooling. These values are used as reported and flagged, not corrected.

C

Calculated

Calculated free cash flow

When a company does not report FCF directly, it remains marked as calculated. Its Evidence panel separately identifies internal graph validation, public calculation replay, and public source-chain coverage; an input absent from the public preview is not presented as a public input.

Documented missing

Missing capex data

When capital expenditure is unavailable, FCF cannot be calculated and both fields remain blank rather than being estimated.

N

Comparable with note

Per-share comparability

Pre-stock-split per-share figures may not be directly comparable across years. A public note records the split event.

03

Working rules

Quality principles

01

Source documents

Annual reports and company disclosures form the primary evidence base for annual and interim data rows.

02

Reported vs calculated

Reported fields remain separate from calculated fields such as margins, FCF and valuation ratios.

03

Missing values

Unavailable values remain blank and documented. Gaps are not estimated or interpolated.

04

Currency separation

Reporting and market currencies are tracked separately so their different roles remain explicit.

05

Interim reporting

Q1 and H1 coverage varies by company; a sales update is not treated as a full P&L release.

06

Conditional valuation

P/E and EV/EBITDA appear only when market data, currency context and accounting inputs support them.

07

Source tracking

Source URLs and status fields connect annual rows to company disclosures or archived official reports.

08

Provenance scope

Field-level provenance covers selected accounting fields and source-backed annual-report data. Market-data fields do not yet all carry field-level provenance.

04

Scope and limitations

Use quality context with the data

Market-data fields should be independently re-verified before valuation use where stated. Missing inputs remain blank, and valuation ratios are withheld when their required context is unavailable.

The complete methodology and known package limitations remain published alongside the dataset. Quality documentation is product evidence, not an investment opinion.